[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130204001055.GV4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 00:10:55 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: avr32: add dummy syscalls
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 09:39:54PM +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
> > If you are OK with going that way, I could probably put together patches doing
> > just that. Note that for rt_sigsuspend/rt_sigreturn/sigaltstack the wrappers
> > are not needed at all - they can just use current_pt_regs() in syscall body.
> > IOW, all of syscall-stubs.S could be killed.
>
> Nice, could you put together the preprocessor stuff in a patch? It would be
> great to not having to write a re-occuring stub for each syscall that has 6+
> arguments.
>
> Thanks for looking at this.
Apologies about the delay... One question: what's the AVR32 C ABI for
passing 64bit arguments? The tricky bugger is sys_sync_file_range();
it takes (s32, s64, s64, u32) as arguments and if not any pair of
registers can be used to pass 64bit value, we have more serious trouble
there...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists