lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2013020410070150879010@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:07:05 +0800
From:	majianpeng <majianpeng@...il.com>
To:	"Jens Axboe" <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: For the condition "file->f_mode", when it failed, it should return EACCES rather than EBADF.

Hi all,
	When I wanted to do discard operations,but i set the  openflag was O_RDONLY,it returned a EBADF rather than EACCES or EPERM.
I searched the code and found:
>case BLKDISCARD:
>case BLKSECDISCARD: {
>		uint64_t range[2];

>		if (!(mode & FMODE_WRITE))
>			return -EBADF;
Initial i thought there was error.But i searched all code of kernel and found some places like this.

The description of EBADF is "Bad file numbe". There are some places where returned EBADF like,
>if (!f.file)
>		return -EBADF;

So i think for checking file->f_mode when failed, it should return EACCESS.


Jianpeng Ma
Thanks!


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ