[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <510FC560.6020002@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:27:44 +0800
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
To: "dbasehore ." <dbasehore@...omium.org>
CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
SCSI development list <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] don't wait on disk to start on resume
On 02/04/2013 08:07 AM, dbasehore . wrote:
> On the topic that we do a fast return for both scsi and ata. Now I
> don't remember everything about this (and correct me if I'm wrong)
> since I figured this out a few months ago.
>
> There are some dependencies that scsi has on the resume path of ata. I
> think it's that before we can send the command to spin up the disk, we
> need to wait for the ata host controller to come up. As Aaron Lu
> pointed out, it takes seconds for the ata port to resume. On the hand,
I just did some more recording, the result is:
host controller takes 1ms or less to resume;
port reset takes the most time, almost the same as the whole port resume
callback, 2-4 seconds;
sd resume callback takes 16ms.
So for ata disks, the most time consuming part is in port's reset
routine, which is executed in port's resume callback.
-Aaron
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists