[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130204143401.GW2364@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:34:01 +0200
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] clk: tegra: Implement clocks for Tegra114
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 08:08:55AM +0100, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2013 03:48 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
...
> > + /* xusb_hs_src */
> > + val = readl(clk_base + CLK_SOURCE_XUSB_SS_SRC);
> > + val |= BIT(25); /* always select PLLU_60M */
> > + writel(val, clk_base + CLK_SOURCE_XUSB_SS_SRC);
> > +
> > + clk = clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "xusb_hs_src", "pll_u_60M", 0,
> > + 1, 1);
> > + clks[xusb_hs_src] = clk;
> > +
>
> With device tree we can directly use pll_u_60M, no need to register
> clock with fixed factor 1.
> Same comment for dis1-fixed, dsi2-fixed and mipi-cal-fast clocks.
>
Does it make sense to have separate DT IDs at all then?
Cheers,
Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists