lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:55:55 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
CC:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, alan@...ux.intel.com,
	jirislaby@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	Bryan Mason <bmason@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TTY: do not reset master's packet mode

On 02/01/2013 06:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> wrote:
>> Now that login from util-linux is forced to drop all references to a
>> TTY which it wants to hangup (to reach reference count 1) we are
>> seeing issues with telnet. When login closes its last reference to the
>> slave PTY, it also resets packet mode on the *master* side. And we
>> have a race here.
>>
>> What telnet does is fork+exec of `login'. Then there are two
>> scenarios:
>> * `login' closes the slave TTY and resets thus master's packet mode,
>>   but even now telnet properly sets the mode, or
>> * `telnetd' sets packet mode on the master, `login' closes the slave
>>   TTY and resets master's packet mode.
>>
>> The former case is OK. However the latter happens in much more cases,
>> by the order of magnitude to be precise. So when one tries to login to
>> such a messed telnet setup, they see the following:
>> inux login:
>>             ogin incorrect
>>
>> Note the missing first letters -- telnet thinks it is still in the
>> packet mode, so when it receives "linux login" from `login', it
>> considers "l" as the type of the packet and strips it.
>>
>> SuS does not mention how the implementation should behave. Both BSDs I
>> checked (Free and Net) do not reset the flag upon the last close.
>>
>> By this I am resurrecting an old bug, see References. We are hitting
>> it regularly now, i.e. with updated util-linux, ergo login.
>>
>> Here, I am changing a behavior introduced back in 2.1 times. It would
>> better have a long time testing before goes upstream.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
>> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Bryan Mason <bmason@...hat.com>
>> References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/11/223
>> References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504703
>> References: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797042
> 
> Shouldn't this be CC'd to stable?

Nope, it will be sent to stable as soon as it proves itself to be stable
enough. Note that we are changing very old code and the last thing we
want to do here is to break stable trees.

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ