[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130204030221.GY4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 03:02:21 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: avr32: add dummy syscalls
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 01:31:11AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Unless I'm misreading ocavr32.pdf, that should be (R12, R10:R11, R9, R8) and
> (R12, R10:R11, R9:R8, stack) resp., so fadvise64 doesn't need a wrapper, but
> fadvise64_64 does. And something like (s32, s32, s64, s64) would turn into
> (R12, R11, R9:R8, stack, stack); AFAICS, we don't have anything that ugly...
Oh, yes, we do - fallocate(2). int fd, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len.
On something like mips or sparc32 it packs nicely; on avr32 it doesn't.
Could you confirm that I haven't misparsed the ABI?
> Automating *that* is going to be interesting... I've not given up, but it's
> not going to be fun ;-/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists