[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130204165057.GH13909@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:50:57 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@....com,
Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:07:11PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> I don't have board right now to take the snapshot, but it would be
> like:
>
> $ tree /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/
> ├── affected_cpus
> ├── bios_limit
> ├── cpb
> ├── cpuinfo_cur_freq
> ├── cpuinfo_max_freq
> ├── cpuinfo_min_freq
> ├── cpuinfo_transition_latency
> ├── related_cpus
> ├── scaling_available_frequencies
> ├── scaling_available_governors
> ├── scaling_cur_freq
> ├── scaling_driver
> ├── scaling_governor
> ├── scaling_max_freq
> ├── scaling_min_freq
> ├── scaling_setspeed
> └── stats
> ├── time_in_state
> ├── total_trans
> └── trans_table
> └── ondemand
> ├── sampling_rate
> ├── up_threshold
> └── ignore_nice
So this is adding the current governor as a per-cpu thing.
> > One thing I've come to realize with the current interface is that if
> > you want to change stuff, you need to iterate over all cpus instead of
> > writing to a system-wide node.
>
> Not really. Following is the way by which cpu/cpu*/cpufreq directories
> are created:
That's not what I meant - I meant from userspace:
for $i in $(grep processor /proc/cpuinfo | awk '{ print $3 }');
do
echo "performance" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$i/cpufreq/scaling_governor;
done
Instead of
echo "performance" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/scaling_governor
which is hypothetical but sets it for the whole system without fuss.
[ … ]
> I want to control it over clock-domain, but can't get that in cpu/cpufreq/.
> Policies don't have numbers assigned to them.
So, give them names.
> So, i am working on ARM's big.LITTLE system where we have two
> clusters. One of A15s and other of A7s. Because of their different
> power ratings or performance figures, we need to have separate set of
> ondemand tunables for them. And hence this patch. Though this patch is
> required for any multi-cluster system.
So you want this (values after "="):
cpu/cpufreq/
|-> policy0
|-> name = A15
|-> min_freq = ...
|-> max_freq = ...
|-> affected_cpus = 0,1,2,...
|-> ondemand
|-> sampling_rate
|-> up_threshold
|-> ignore_nice
...
|-> policy1
|-> name = A7
|-> min_freq = ...
|-> max_freq = ...
|-> affected_cpus = n,n+1,n+2,...
|-> performance
|-> sampling_rate
|-> up_threshold
|-> ignore_nice
...
Other arches create other policies and that's it. If you need another
policy added to the set, you simply add 'policyN++' and that's it.
I think this is cleaner but whatever - I don't care that much. My
only strong concern is that this thing should be a Kconfig option and
optional for arches where it doesn't apply.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists