[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1302032213410.28934-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:15:55 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Li, Fei" <fei.li@...el.com>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V4] suspend: enable freeze timeout configuration through
sys
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Li, Fei wrote:
> > -> the situation described above shouldn't happen and if it does, then there
> > is a bug that needs to be fixed.
>
> Yes, we agree with that it's a bug that needs to be fixed, and we are already done
> for some cases.
> During the process, we realize that tuning the timeout value to smaller value will help
> to expose freezing failure for some cases.
Besides, the underlying bug is well known (fuse filesystems hanging
because the fuse daemon gets frozen before the process doing file I/O,
or something like that) and so far nobody has a good idea of how to
fix it.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists