linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] atm/nicstar: don't use idr_remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:35:08 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	chas williams - CONTRACTOR <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] atm/nicstar: don't use idr_remove_all()

Hey,

On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 01:10:34PM -0500, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
> you assign id1 to 0, so this never happens i think.  i don't think the
> reason to preassign id1/id2 exists anymore once the do loop is removed.
> 
> > +			id1 = idr_alloc(&card->idr, handle1, 0, 0, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +			if (id1 < 0) {
> > +				err = id1;
> 
> you dont need to assign err since it isn't returned.

Heh, I put v2 under the wrong thread.  I'll do v3 and post it under
v1.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/