[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130204183508.GU27963@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:35:08 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: chas williams - CONTRACTOR <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] atm/nicstar: don't use idr_remove_all()
Hey,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 01:10:34PM -0500, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
> you assign id1 to 0, so this never happens i think. i don't think the
> reason to preassign id1/id2 exists anymore once the do loop is removed.
>
> > + id1 = idr_alloc(&card->idr, handle1, 0, 0, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + if (id1 < 0) {
> > + err = id1;
>
> you dont need to assign err since it isn't returned.
Heh, I put v2 under the wrong thread. I'll do v3 and post it under
v1.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists