[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130204183929.GA5570@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:39:29 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: fangxiaozhi 00110321 <fangxiaozhi@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zihan@...wei.com, Lin.Lei@...wei.com, neil.yi@...wei.com,
wangyuhua@...wei.com, huqiao36@...wei.com, balbi@...com,
mdharm-usb@...-eyed-alien.net, sebastian@...akpoint.cc
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] USB: storage: Define a new macro for USB storage
match rules
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:14:46PM +0800, fangxiaozhi 00110321 wrote:
> +/* Define the device is matched with Vendor ID and interface descriptors */
> +#define UNUSUAL_VENDOR_INTF(id_vendor, cl, sc, pr, \
> + vendorName, productName, useProtocol, useTransport, \
> + initFunction, flags) \
> +{ \
> + .match_flags = USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_INFO \
> + | USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_VENDOR, \
> + .idVendor = (id_vendor), \
> + .bInterfaceClass = (cl), \
> + .bInterfaceSubClass = (sc), \
> + .bInterfaceProtocol = (pr), \
> + .driver_info = (flags) \
> +}
I'm not going to reject this given the number of times it has been
submitted, but can't you use the USB_VENDOR_AND_INTERFACE_INFO() macro
here in this definition?
If so, can you send me an add-on patch that makes that change?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists