lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:03:05 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>, Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] uprobes/perf: Avoid uprobe_apply() whenever possible

uprobe_perf_open/close call the costly uprobe_apply() every time,
we can avoid it if:

	- "nr_systemwide != 0" is not changed.

	- There is another process/thread with the same ->mm.

	- copy_proccess() does inherit_event(). dup_mmap() preserves the
	  inserted breakpoints.

	- event->attr.enable_on_exec == T, we can rely on uprobe_mmap()
	  called by exec/mmap paths.

	- tp_target is exiting. Only _close() checks PF_EXITING, I don't
	  think TRACE_REG_PERF_OPEN can hit the dying task too often.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 1114619..e4aab34 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -677,30 +677,60 @@ __uprobe_perf_filter(struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter, struct mm_struct *mm)
 	return false;
 }
 
+static inline bool
+uprobe_filter_event(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	return __uprobe_perf_filter(&tu->filter, event->hw.tp_target->mm);
+}
+
 static int uprobe_perf_open(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
 {
+	bool done;
+
 	write_lock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
-	if (event->hw.tp_target)
+	if (event->hw.tp_target) {
+		/*
+		 * event->parent != NULL means copy_process(), we can avoid
+		 * uprobe_apply(). current->mm must be probed and we can rely
+		 * on dup_mmap() which preserves the already installed bp's.
+		 *
+		 * attr.enable_on_exec means that exec/mmap will install the
+		 * breakpoints we need.
+		 */
+		done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide ||
+			event->parent || event->attr.enable_on_exec ||
+			uprobe_filter_event(tu, event);
 		list_add(&event->hw.tp_list, &tu->filter.perf_events);
-	else
+	} else {
+		done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide;
 		tu->filter.nr_systemwide++;
+	}
 	write_unlock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
 
-	uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, true);
+	if (!done)
+		uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, true);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int uprobe_perf_close(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
 {
+	bool done;
+
 	write_lock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
-	if (event->hw.tp_target)
+	if (event->hw.tp_target) {
 		list_del(&event->hw.tp_list);
-	else
+		done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide ||
+			(event->hw.tp_target->flags & PF_EXITING) ||
+			uprobe_filter_event(tu, event);
+	} else {
 		tu->filter.nr_systemwide--;
+		done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide;
+	}
 	write_unlock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
 
-	uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, false);
+	if (!done)
+		uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, false);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ