[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130204190243.GA10858@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:02:43 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>, Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] perf: Ensure we do not free event->parent before event
__perf_event_exit_task() does:
sync_child_event(event)
free_event(event)
sync_child_event() does put_event(event->parent) which can actually
free ->parent. This means that event->destroy(event) is called with
->parent pointing to nowhere.
perf_free_event() does put_parent(parent) before free_event(child)
too.
Afaics, currently this is fine. But the tracing "subclasses" (like
trace_uprobe) may want to track the events and their parents, and even
the fact that parent->destroy() is called before child->destroy() can
complicate this.
Move this put_event() from sync_child_event() to its single caller,
__perf_event_exit_task(). Change perf_free_event() the same way.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 301079d..1b2e516 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6787,12 +6787,6 @@ static void sync_child_event(struct perf_event *child_event,
mutex_lock(&parent_event->child_mutex);
list_del_init(&child_event->child_list);
mutex_unlock(&parent_event->child_mutex);
-
- /*
- * Release the parent event, if this was the last
- * reference to it.
- */
- put_event(parent_event);
}
static void
@@ -6800,7 +6794,9 @@ __perf_event_exit_task(struct perf_event *child_event,
struct perf_event_context *child_ctx,
struct task_struct *child)
{
- if (child_event->parent) {
+ struct perf_event *parent_event = child_event->parent;
+
+ if (parent_event) {
raw_spin_lock_irq(&child_ctx->lock);
perf_group_detach(child_event);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&child_ctx->lock);
@@ -6813,9 +6809,14 @@ __perf_event_exit_task(struct perf_event *child_event,
* that are still around due to the child reference. These
* events need to be zapped.
*/
- if (child_event->parent) {
+ if (parent_event) {
sync_child_event(child_event, child);
free_event(child_event);
+ /*
+ * Release the parent event, if this was the last
+ * reference to it.
+ */
+ put_event(parent_event);
}
}
@@ -6867,8 +6868,7 @@ static void perf_event_exit_task_context(struct task_struct *child, int ctxn)
* We can recurse on the same lock type through:
*
* __perf_event_exit_task()
- * sync_child_event()
- * put_event()
+ * put_event(parent_event)
* mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex)
*
* But since its the parent context it won't be the same instance.
@@ -6937,11 +6937,11 @@ static void perf_free_event(struct perf_event *event,
list_del_init(&event->child_list);
mutex_unlock(&parent->child_mutex);
- put_event(parent);
-
perf_group_detach(event);
list_del_event(event, ctx);
free_event(event);
+
+ put_event(parent);
}
/*
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists