[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130204214952.GJ27963@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:49:52 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: joe@...ches.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc: percpu_counter doc code for better readability
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:31:56AM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Help people reading the percpu_counter code, to notice the ifdef
> else statement that seperates CONFIG_SMP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> include/linux/percpu_counter.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
> index b9df9ed..eded1aa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static inline int percpu_counter_initialized(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
> return (fbc->counters != NULL);
> }
>
> -#else
> +#else /* No CONFIG_SMP */
"#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */" would be more conventional. Can you please
change that and repost it w/ my Acked-by and [TRIVIAL] tag added and
Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org> cc'd?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists