[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51109BB3.8000706@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 11:12:11 +0530
From: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] clk: tegra: Refactor PLL programming code
On Monday 04 February 2013 08:02 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 07:06:47AM +0100, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
>> On Friday 01 February 2013 03:48 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> ...
>
>>> -static int clk_pll_wait_for_lock(struct tegra_clk_pll *pll,
>>> - void __iomem *lock_addr, u32 lock_bit_idx)
>>> +static int clk_pll_wait_for_lock(struct tegra_clk_pll *pll)
>>> {
>>> int i;
>>> - u32 val;
>>> + u32 val, lock_bit;
>>> + void __iomem *lock_addr;
>>>
>>> if (!(pll->flags & TEGRA_PLL_USE_LOCK)) {
>>> udelay(pll->params->lock_delay);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + lock_addr = pll->clk_base + pll->params->base_reg;
>> This will not work for PLLE. Lock bit for PLLE is in misc register.
>>
>>> + lock_bit = BIT(pll->params->lock_bit_idx);
>>> +
>>> for (i = 0; i < pll->params->lock_delay; i++) {
>>> val = readl_relaxed(lock_addr);
>>> - if (val & BIT(lock_bit_idx)) {
>>> + if (val & lock_bit) {
>> Need to change the lock bit idx parameter for Tegra20 and Tegra30 PLLs
>> else this patch will break those.
>>
> Looking at commit 37c26a906527b8a6a252614ca83d21ad318c4e84 and commit
> b08e8c0ecc42afa3a2e1019851af741980dd5a6b, these fields seem correctly
> initialized for both Tegra20 and Tegra30? Or am I missing something?
Ohh, I missed to read
lock_bit = BIT(pll->params->lock_bit_idx);
Am I missing something about PLLE lock_addr also?
> Thanks,
>
> Peter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists