| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130205082822.GE21389@suse.de> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:28:22 +0000 From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> To: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, minchan@...nel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: cma: fix accounting of CMA pages placed in high memory On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 08:29:26AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > > > > (This information is needed so that others can make patch-scheduling > > decisions and should be included in all bugfix changelogs unless it is > > obvious). > > CMA Highmem support is new feature. so don't need to go stable tree. > You could have given a lot more information to that question! How new a feature is it? Does this mean that this patch must go in before 3.8 releases or is it a fix against a patch that is only in Andrew's tree? If the patch is only in Andrew's tree, which one is it and should this be folded in as a fix? On a semi-related note; is there a plan for backporting highmem support for the LTSI kernel considering it's aimed at embedded and CMA was highlighted in their announcment for 3.4 support? -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists