linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: cpufreq_driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1535355.NvOsIhbBYp@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Tue, 05 Feb 2013 11:13:17 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: cpufreq_driver_lock is hot on large systems

On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 03:28:30 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > I actually don't agree with that, becuase the Nathan's apprach shows the
> > reasoning that leads to the RCU introduction quite clearly.  So if you
> > don't have technical problems with the patchset, I'm going to take it as is.
> 
> Great!!
> 
> Okay.. I don't have any technical problems with it, i reviewed most of it
> carefully. The only pending thing is rebase on linux-next, after that i can
> give my ack for it.

Yes, it would be great if it were rebased and retested.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/