[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <798741360060024@web12h.yandex.ru>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:27:04 +0400
From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
To: Honghui Zhang <zhanghonghui@...wei.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re:[PATCH] sched/rt: Decrease number of calls of push_rt_task() in push_rt_tasks()
> On 2013/2/5 15:22, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
>>> Suppose we have a large number of cpus(say 4096), with the last one running
>>> a low-priority task on it. Is it possible with this patch we will never reach
>>> the last cpu in case that previous cpu has complete the pulled task?
>>
>> Yes. But this patch is about several pushable tasks on the same cpu.
>>
>> Kirill
>
> Maybe I haven't make myself understood, but in that case, there will be a higher-priority
> task in the runqueue of the pushing cpu, and a lower-priority task running in the last cpu
> which could not be preempt by push_rt_task(), I don't think it's acceptable.
Sure, I tried to prevent the fact of call of this function with locks of spinlocks etc. It may
be useful on system like 2 CPU, but it's not necessary for large systems. I'm not persist in this.
Kirill
>
> Hans
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists