[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohponiiVO_P2EDDTUHeoo7j3FG-ELtP8oLwfdEQ3HkgOS77g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:42:23 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@....com,
Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors
On 5 February 2013 16:34, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> Here's an even cleaner way:
>
> platform_driver:
> init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> ...
>
> add_additional_sysfs_entries(policy);
>
> ...
> }
>
> ...
>
> static void add_additional_sysfs_entries(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPUFREQ_MULTIPLE_POLICIES
> create-folder-in-cpu/cpu*/cpufreq;
> ...
> #endif
> }
>
> and the platform driver will have in its Kconfig section:
>
> config CPUFREQ_PLATFORM_DRIVER_X
> ...
> select CPUFREQ_MULTIPLE_POLICIES
>
>
> You don't need the policy->have_multiple_policies member even.
Tricky part is the name of this routine: add_additional_sysfs_entries().
I am not proposing additional set of directories inside cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/
but either of cpu/cpufreq/ or cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/ for governor.
And so, keeping that additional variable looks a better solution. Let me
get a patch with this change only and see how it looks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists