| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKohpomUsDr0YJmOxjymcAAJnfOxKfzxGL4iHuif1qCAvy0OYA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:56:03 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com, Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors On 5 February 2013 16:49, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 04:42:23PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Tricky part is the name of this routine: add_additional_sysfs_entries(). > > Now you're just being silly - this is just an example how to do it. If > you want me to do it for ya, you need to send me your monthly salary. Haha... I don't want you to do it. I don't want such routine to be exposed to cpufreq drivers as this belongs to the core code. Just some kind of indication from platform driver is required about how/where it wants its governor directory to be present. And the variable suits more here. Lets discuss it more on the next patch i send :) -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists