[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130205130302.GA2042@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:03:02 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bengt Jonsson <bengt.g.jonsson@...ricsson.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/73] ARM: ux500: Vsmps3 controlled by SysClkReq1
On Tue, 05 Feb 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:21:36PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > What is needed is some way to model that
> > electronic relationship into both the regulator
> > and clock subsystems (Ulf Hansson is working on
> > the ABx500 clocks as we speak.)
>
> > Maybe the actual place to have it would be
> > somewhere like drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c.
>
> > Have you seen similar stuff in other PMICs?
>
> Yes, it's fairly common to at least have hardware enable signals. If
> what was going on was actually understood by the driver in some way it
> might be better but right now... Especially in a series like this it's
> really bad to just see loads of patches which boil down to "change the
> semi-documented magic value" - this just makes the series depressing to
> read.
I'm currently working on making _slightly_ less depressing - bear with. :)
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists