[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomdH_s4xMtUo8-hSBEYqRVTEo5eCUG=vH4K5WckUi2KiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 19:25:44 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@....com,
Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors
On 5 February 2013 18:52, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 05:54:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:q
>> This indication isn't enough. On a single image solution, we need to
>> identify the system which needs support for multiple policies and i
>> still feel we need that variable type indication :)
>
> If the image is going to run also on systems which support only a
> single policy, then I guess you can make it a bool, stuff it in struct
> cpufreq_policy and ifdef around it.
That's what i proposed initially.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists