[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51106AF1.4030804@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:14:09 -0500
From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] setxattr bugs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2/2/13 11:30 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> * JFS, since 2005: setxattr(name, "system.posix_acl_access", NULL,
> 0, 0) succeeds, creating an empty EA with "system.posix_acl_access"
> as name. Validity checks should apply _after_ if (value == NULL) {
> /* empty EA, do not remove */ value = ""; value_len = 0; } and not
> before it. * reiserfs, since 2009: setxattr(name, attr_name, NULL,
> 0, 0) is treated as removexattr(name, attr_name), not as emptying
> given xattr.
>
> The question is, does either of those cross into "established
> weirdness in ABI" or are they still at the "bugs to be fixed"
> stage?
Since the behavior changed once already in 2009 I'd call it a bug.
That code was in the SLES kernel for a while before then and I still
haven't seen a bug report on it.
- -Jeff
> FWIW, I'm seriously tempted to stop passing NULL as the third
> argument of ->setxattr(), essentially taking all those if (!value)
> value = ""; pieces from individual ->setxattr() instances to
> __vfs_setxattr_noperm() (all other callers of ->setxattr() never
> pass NULL data or 0 size, so it's irrelevant for them). Would fix
> both jfs and reiserfs weirdness....
>
> Objections?
- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org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=G2cU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists