[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51113637.7070209@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:41:27 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Andy King <acking@...are.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, pv-drivers@...are.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] VM Sockets for Linux upstreaming
Hi,
> Unlike previous submissions, where the new socket family was entirely reliant
> on VMware's VMCI PCI device (and thus VMware's hypervisor), VM Sockets is now
> *completely* separated out into two parts, each in its own module:
Some separation still needs to be done:
CC [M] net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.o
In file included from
/home/kraxel/projects/linux/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:102:0:
/home/kraxel/projects/linux/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.h:21:33: fatal error:
linux/vmw_vmci_defs.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make[4]: *** [net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.o] Error 1
[ with vmci series from jan 9th applied on top it builds ]
Module deps are a bit bogous too:
vmw_vsock_vmci_transport 26162 0
vsock 34481 1 vmw_vsock_vmci_transport
vmw_vmci 61602 2 vsock,vmw_vsock_vmci_transport
Only vmw_vsock_vmci_transport should have a vmw_vmci dependency, not
vsock ...
Nevertheless this should be good enough to start hacking up a virtio
prototype.
cheers,
Gerd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists