[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130205164520.GA4276@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:45:20 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] workqueue: don't set work cwq until we queued it
on pool
Hey, Lai.
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:00:42PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> The @cpu can be WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, and the current code will delay
> to determine on which cpu should this work be queued until timeout,
> I didn't want to change this behavior when I wrote the patch.
Hmmm? The current code determines the CPU on queue_delayed_work().
/*
* If we cannot get the last pool from @work directly,
* select the last CPU such that it avoids unnecessarily
* triggering non-reentrancy check in __queue_work().
*/
lcpu = cpu;
if (pool)
lcpu = pool->cpu;
if (lcpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
lcpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
@lcpu is never WORK_CPU_UNBOUND for bound workqueues and for unbound
workqueues we of course have cwq for WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
> PS, again, @cpu and @wq can be saved/encoded in dwork.work.entry if needed.
If possible, I'd much prefer to keep it inside delayed_work() proper.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists