[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130205184438.GL4827@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 19:44:38 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
Robin Randhawa <Robin.Randhawa@....com>,
Steve Bannister <Steve.Bannister@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 06:38:07PM +0000, Charles Garcia-Tobin wrote:
> Later. Whatever you'd like to call it, but essentially a set of cpus,
> as linux understands them, that are logically related by the fact that
> you'd like to be able to use the same tuning policy and same governor
> across all of them.
Right, policy will be applied to the whole set, yes, but can you imagine
that per-core settings could also make sense at some point?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists