linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 05/23] tty: Remove unnecessary re-test of ldisc ref count

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1360095638-6624-6-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Date:	Tue,  5 Feb 2013 15:20:20 -0500
From:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 05/23] tty: Remove unnecessary re-test of ldisc ref count

Since the tty->ldisc is prevented from being changed by tty_set_ldisc()
when a tty is being hung up, re-testing the ldisc user count is
unnecessary -- ie, it cannot be a different ldisc and the user count
cannot have increased (assuming the caller meets the precondition that
TTY_LDISC flag is cleared)

Removal of the 'early-out' locking optimization is necessary for
the subsequent patch 'tty: Fix ldisc halt sequence on hangup'.

Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
---
 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index 70d2b86..405e972 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -558,29 +558,29 @@ static int tty_ldisc_halt(struct tty_struct *tty)
  *	have been halted for this to guarantee it remains idle.
  *
  *	Caller must hold legacy and ->ldisc_mutex.
+ *
+ *	NB: tty_set_ldisc() is prevented from changing the ldisc concurrently
+ *	with this function by checking the TTY_HUPPING flag.
  */
 static bool tty_ldisc_hangup_wait_idle(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
-	while (tty->ldisc) {	/* Not yet closed */
-		if (atomic_read(&tty->ldisc->users) != 1) {
-			char cur_n[TASK_COMM_LEN], tty_n[64];
-			long timeout = 3 * HZ;
-			tty_unlock(tty);
-
-			while (tty_ldisc_wait_idle(tty, timeout) == -EBUSY) {
-				timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
-				printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
-					"%s: waiting (%s) for %s took too long, but we keep waiting...\n",
-					__func__, get_task_comm(cur_n, current),
-					tty_name(tty, tty_n));
-			}
-			/* must reacquire both locks and preserve lock order */
-			mutex_unlock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
-			tty_lock(tty);
-			mutex_lock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
-			continue;
+	char cur_n[TASK_COMM_LEN], tty_n[64];
+	long timeout = 3 * HZ;
+
+	if (tty->ldisc) {	/* Not yet closed */
+		tty_unlock(tty);
+
+		while (tty_ldisc_wait_idle(tty, timeout) == -EBUSY) {
+			timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
+			printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
+				"%s: waiting (%s) for %s took too long, but we keep waiting...\n",
+				__func__, get_task_comm(cur_n, current),
+				tty_name(tty, tty_n));
 		}
-		break;
+		/* must reacquire both locks and preserve lock order */
+		mutex_unlock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
+		tty_lock(tty);
+		mutex_lock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
 	}
 	return !!(tty->ldisc);
 }
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/