linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 2/2] initramfs with digital signature protection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1360094930.3859.90.camel@falcor1>
Date:	Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:08:50 -0500
From:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] initramfs with digital signature protection

On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:03 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:

> It's not clear to me why we need this encapsulation - wouldn't it be
> better to add another [pointer,size] pair to the bootloader protocol
> with a structure like:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/30/68 was in response to the assumption
that the initramfs is measured/appraised.  These patches attempt to
address those concerns.

Mimi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/