[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1360095638-6624-21-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:20:35 -0500
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ilya Zykov <ilya@...x.ru>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 20/23] tty: Remove stale comment re: locking in tty_ldisc_release()
This comment pre-dates the obvious locking used in the function;
delete it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index d7ebe79..92629c1 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ void tty_ldisc_release(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_struct *o_tty)
tty_ldisc_halt(tty, o_tty, NULL, NULL, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
tty_lock_pair(tty, o_tty);
- /* This will need doing differently if we need to lock */
+
tty_ldisc_kill(tty);
if (o_tty)
tty_ldisc_kill(o_tty);
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists