[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201302052303.01795.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 23:03:01 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
dahinds@...rs.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/xsysace - replace in(out)_8/in(out)_be16/in(out)_le16 with generic iowrite(read)8/16(be)
On Tuesday 05 February 2013, Michal Simek wrote:
> I want to be sure about this. I have parsed this again with closer look and
> seems to me that ioread32 is equal to readl and iowrite32 to writel.
> Arnd: Am I right?
Correct. On all the architectures you care about (most importantly, not
x86), readl and ioread32 are defined to have the same semantics. There
are a few exceptions where ioread32 provides a wrapper for PCI
PIO accesses that are not memory mapped, making ioread32 slightly
slower than readl, but for all practical purposes you don't have
to worry about it ;-)
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists