[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5111E093.4060600@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:48:19 +0900
From: Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"gnurou@...il.com" <gnurou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] gpiolib: use gpio_chips list in gpiochip_find_base
On 02/06/2013 02:21 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This looks like it is preserving this userspace-sensitive semantic
> so that dynamically added chips will still get the same assigned
> numbers.
It does (it should, at least), the assigned ranges should be strictly
identical to the previous version. While testing I also made sure all
chips had the same GPIO range.
> But I want some guarantees, so state clearly in the commit
> that any dynamically assigned chip will get the same base
> address after this change as it got before it, and please take
> this opportunity to add a comment stating that this search
> method is vital for userspace ABIs, and must be preserved.
Done. I will take the blame if something goes wrong. :)
Thanks,
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists