linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V2 1/6] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: use arch_initcall and module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <A4887BF146CD57468F700B415D2F4701583209@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2013 06:04:22 +0000
From:	"Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish" <manishv.b@...com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com" 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"khilman@...prootsystems.com" <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com" 
	<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"hs@...x.de" <hs@...x.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 1/6] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: use arch_initcall and
	module_exit

Hi Russell,

On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 16:57:31, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 06:36:34AM +0000, Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish wrote:
> > I made following changes, in order to update "dip->p" pointer with 
> > correct value:
> > 
> > -       if (!dpi->p) {
> > +       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dpi->p)) {
> >                 dpi->p = devm_pinctrl_get(dev);
> > -               if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dpi->p)) {
> > -                       int ret = PTR_ERR(dpi->p);
> > -
> > -                       dev_dbg(dev, "no pinctrl handle\n");
> > -                       /* Only return deferrals */
> > -                       if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > -                               return ret;
> > -                       return 0;
> > -               }
> > +               ret = PTR_ERR(dpi->p);
> > +               dev_dbg(dev, "no pinctrl handle\n");
> > +               /* Only return deferrals */
> > +               if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > +                       return ret;
> > +               return 0;
> > 
> > Is this intended change?
> 
> The above looks totally broken to me.
> 
> Oh, it's using IS_ERR_OR_NULL(), so it's bound to be broken.
> 

I went through discussion in community on usage of "IS_ERR_OR_NULL".
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1953271/
Will take care not use this in future.

Thanks,
Manish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/