linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] PM: make VT switching to the suspend console optional v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130206092108.GI5813@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date:	Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:21:08 +0100
From:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] PM: make VT switching to the suspend
 console optional v3

On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:02:17PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 01:55:44 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:26:26 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Monday, February 04, 2013 01:37:20 PM Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > KMS drivers can potentially restore the display configuration without
> > > > userspace help.  Such drivers can can call a new funciton,
> > > > pm_vt_switch_required(false) if they support this feature.  In that
> > > > case, the PM layer won't VT switch to the suspend console at suspend
> > > > time and then back to the original VT on resume, but rather leave things
> > > > alone for a nicer looking suspend and resume sequence.
> > > > 
> > > > v2: make a function so we can handle multiple drivers (Alan)
> > > > v3: use a list to track device requests (Rafael)
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > > 
> > > for all [1-3/3].
> > 
> > Any chance for an r-b on the PM one at least?  Then Daniel could
> > probably push this through drm-intel-next.
> 
> Done.

Thanks, I've merged the first two patches to drm-intel-next, the i915 one
still needs a bit of care imo.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/