[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6sCBCGfLDAGVRgP3cnmE+oyXBDdPeVXVCqrsvCh13yPiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:11:56 +0000
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Heads up on a device tree change
Hi Stephen,
I've just pushed out a change which cleans up platform device
registration to use the same path whether or not the device tree is
used. It should be safe, but there is a risk of breakage on powerpc
platforms.
The patch has two effects of note:
- DT generated platform devices move from /sys/devices to under
/sys/devices/platform. Userspace *should* be okay with this, but if
there are any problems then I can post a workaround patch that keeps
DT generiated platform_devices in the current location.
- Resources on platform_devices get registered so they appear in
/proc/iomem and /proc/ioports and so that device drivers get the added
protection of request_region. This will cause breakage on device trees
nodes with partially overlapping memory regions. (ie. 0x100..0x1ff and
0x180..0x27f). I also have a workaround for this, but I doubt that it
will be necessary.
I'm not worried about it, but it is a sufficiently visible change that
I want you to be aware that it is there.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists