[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130206132427.GB15280@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:24:27 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/18] perf: add memory access sampling support
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
> Em Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 02:03:55PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > * Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >> This patch series had a new feature to the kernel perf_events
> > >> interface and corresponding user level tool, perf.
>
> > > Ok, so I have created a topic tree for this, tip:perf/x86.
>
> > > I have applied the kernel bits (with some minor renaming
> > > changes). Arnaldo, if you agree with the tooling bits you can
> > > merge that branch into your tree and apply the tooling bits from
> > > Stephane.
>
> > Arnaldo, did you incorporate the perf changes for this somewhere in
> > your tree yet? The kernel bits are in.
>
> I'm doing it, updating some csets on the go, will post here
> after I go thru some tests.
Great. Please pull/merge tip:perf/x86 directly before you apply
and test the tooling bits - right now it's not in tip:master nor
in perf/core. That way it will be in the tree as a coherent
unit.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists