lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 06:05:09 -0800 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] workqueue: fix work_busy() Hey, Lai. On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com> wrote: >> Given the advisory nature of the function, why do we care? Is it >> needed for later patches? > > Ah, yes. Please elaborate. Also, things like that - why the patch needs to exist or what the benefits are - really should be in the patch description. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists