[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1302061048180.1893-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:51:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Shane Huang <shane.huang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] sd: change to auto suspend mode
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > The "if (err == -EAGAIN)" test and the call to pm_schedule_suspend seem
> > to have been dropped since v8 of this series. It looks like they ought
> > to be moved into sdev_runtime_suspend.
>
> I thought they were no longer needed...
You did not mention this in the patch description.
> For sd, we have request based rutime PM and the PM core will always try
> to autosuspend the device with the timer; and for sr, the poll will
> trigger suspend constantly.
What if the poll has been disabled?
> And for both, we don't return -EAGAIN anyway.
> So I suppose that code is not necessary?
You could replace it with WARN_ON(err == -EAGAIN). That way if some
SCSI driver does return -EAGAIN in the future, people will know
something is wrong.
> BTW, I'll be on vocation till 02/17, and I don't have access to the
> internet in my hometown, but please feel free to drop any comments and
> I'll check them when I get back.
I'm going on vacation next week too. Enjoy your trip.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists