[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOh2x=kJPFyhkG3y_q=a5ciG1HRAn-JkoVYy9OZ9POA+-isbCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:28:26 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: dirk.brandewie@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] cpufreq: balance out cpufreq_cpu_{get,put} for
scaling drivers using setpolicy
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:54 PM, <dirk.brandewie@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
>
> There is an additional reference added to the driver in
> cpufreq_add_dev() that is removed in__cpufreq_governor() if the
> driver implements target(). Remove the last reference when the
> driver implements setpolicy()
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 622e282..d17477b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1049,6 +1049,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif
> if (cpufreq_driver->target)
> __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
>
> + if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy)
> + cpufreq_cpu_put(data);
I don't understand this patch at all.. I grepped both cpufreq_cpu_get() & put()
in bleeding-edge and found everything to be correct.
Can you please point me to the exact line numbers ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists