[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360166840.2621.45.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:07:20 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Question on lockdep and MAX_LOCK_DEPTH
On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 07:56 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
> > I'm 99% sure that the bug is in your modifications.
>
> I'm sorry, I tried to make that clear.
You said it was an out of tree module, I didn't realize it had changes
to the core Linux as well.
> My tree is here, minus a few debugging patches related to this bug:
>
> http://dmz2.candelatech.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linux-3.7.dev.y/.git;a=summary
Here's your bug:
3319 list_for_each_entry_rcu(ptype, &ptype_all, list) {
3320 if (!ptype->dev || ptype->dev == skb->dev) {
3321 if (pt_prev) {
3322 ret = deliver_skb(skb, pt_prev, orig_dev);
3323 if (ret == NET_RX_CONSUMED) {
3324 kfree_skb(skb); /* we made a copy in deliver_skb */
3325 goto out;
3326 }
3327 }
One of many. All those "goto out;"s skip the rcu_read_unlock().
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists