[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130207104656.GE16987@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:46:56 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: "Manjunathappa, Prakash" <prakash.pm@...com>
Cc: "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"mporter@...com" <mporter@...com>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
"cjb@...top.org" <cjb@...top.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"nsekhar@...com" <nsekhar@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"hs@...x.de" <hs@...x.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mmc: davinci_mmc: add DT support
Hello,
I have a couple of comments on the dt bindings and the way it's parsed.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 07:57:04AM +0000, Manjunathappa, Prakash wrote:
> Adds device tree support for davinci_mmc. Also add binding documentation.
> Tested in non-dma PIO mode and without GPIO card_detect/write_protect
> option because of dependencies on EDMA and GPIO module DT support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manjunathappa, Prakash <prakash.pm@...com>
> Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com
> Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
> Cc: cjb@...top.org
> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
> Cc: mporter@...com
> ---
> Since v1:
> Modified DT parse function to take default values and accomodate controller
> version in compatible field.
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/davinci_mmc.txt | 30 ++++++++
> drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/davinci_mmc.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/davinci_mmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/davinci_mmc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6717ab1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/davinci_mmc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +* TI Highspeed MMC host controller for DaVinci
> +
> +The Highspeed MMC Host Controller on TI DaVinci family
> +provides an interface for MMC, SD and SDIO types of memory cards.
> +
> +This file documents the properties used by the davinci_mmc driver.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible:
> + Should be "ti,davinci-mmc-da830": for da830, da850, dm365
> + Should be "ti,davinci-mmc-dm355": for dm355, dm644x
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- bus-width: Number of data lines, can be <4>, or <8>, default <1>
> +- max-frequency: Maximum operating clock frequency, default 25MHz.
> +- mmc-cap-mmc-highspeed: Indicates support for MMC in high speed mode
> +- mmc-cap-sd-highspeed: Indicates support for SD in high speed mode
I thought the last two were derivable from max-frequency?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/15/231
[...]
> +static struct davinci_mmc_config
> + *mmc_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + struct device_node *np;
> struct davinci_mmc_config *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> + const struct of_device_id *match =
> + of_match_device(of_match_ptr(davinci_mmc_dt_ids), &pdev->dev);
> + u32 data;
> +
> + np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + if (!np)
> + return pdata;
> +
> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pdata) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to allocate memory for struct davinci_mmc_config\n");
> + goto nodata;
> + }
> +
> + if (match->data)
> + pdata->version = (u8)((int)match->data);
> +
> + of_property_read_u32(np, "max-frequency", &pdata->max_freq);
> + if (!pdata->max_freq)
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "'max-frequency' property not specified, defaulting to 25MHz\n");
> +
> + if (of_get_property(np, "mmc-cap-mmc-highspeed", NULL))
> + pdata->caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
> + if (of_get_property(np, "mmc-cap-sd-highspeed", NULL))
> + pdata->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED;
If these aren't derivable from max-frequency, you could use
of_property_read_bool to make this clearer.
> +
> + of_property_read_u32(np, "bus-width", &data);
> + switch (data) {
> + case 0:
Judging by the binding doc, should this be 1 rather than 0?
> + case 4:
> + case 8:
> + pdata->wires = data;
> + break;
> + default:
> + pdata->wires = 1;
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported buswidth, defaulting to 1 bit\n");
> + }
> +nodata:
> + return pdata;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init davinci_mmcsd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct davinci_mmc_config *pdata = NULL;
> struct mmc_davinci_host *host = NULL;
> struct mmc_host *mmc = NULL;
> struct resource *r, *mem = NULL;
> int ret = 0, irq = 0;
> size_t mem_size;
>
> + pdata = mmc_parse_pdata(pdev);
> + if (pdata == NULL) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can not get platform data\n");
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> /* REVISIT: when we're fully converted, fail if pdata is NULL */
This comment can presumably disappear judging by the lines above?
[...]
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists