linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / scan: Simplify container driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:38:16 -0700
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / scan: Simplify container driver

On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 12:43 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, February 07, 2013 05:32:15 PM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
 :
> > > Index: test/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- test.orig/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > > +++ test/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > > @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ void acpi_memory_hotplug_init(void);
> > >   #else
> > >   static inline void acpi_memory_hotplug_init(void) {}
> > >   #endif
> > 
> > > +#ifdef ACPI_CONTAINER
> > 
> > It should be CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER.
> 
> Totally correct.

Just FYI, this change is included in my patch 2/2 as well.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2108881/

Thanks,
-Toshi


> > By this, acpi_container_init() do nothing. When I fix it and test the patch,
> > the patch goes well.
> > 
> > If you update the patch, I'll test again.
> 
> This fix from Toshi Kani is necessary in addition to it, though
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2108851/
> 
> because FORCE_EJECT is never set as far as I can say.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/