linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/xsysace - replace in(out)_8/in(out)_be16/in(out)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACxGe6v3ZUEQhi764ivQqE9i2wGzJGcoC0sTVohb_6MQ9sE+hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Feb 2013 14:51:49 +0000
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	dahinds@...rs.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/xsysace - replace in(out)_8/in(out)_be16/in(out)_le16
 with generic iowrite(read)8/16(be)

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>>  In fact, the driver already knows about this and figures
>>> out at runtime how the device is wired up to the bus. This is not the
>>> problem.
>>
>> Except that this is very gross, especially when you observe that in the
>> busted "big endian" case, it has to byteswap the bloody data port.
>>
>> So you end up having to do that gross hack with separate accessors for
>> registers vs. data and not able to use the _rep variants, which also
>> means that on platforms like ppc, you end up with a memory barrier on
>> every access (or more), which is going to slow things down enormously.
>
> I don't see why the _rep variants aren't usable here. The only reason
> I didn't use them when I wrote the driver in the first place was I was
> a n00b kernel hacker and I didn't know they were there.

The 8-bit variant is different though because the hardware requires
pingponging between odd and even byte addresses to flush the fifo.
Reading a data port even address (0x40) gives the least significant
byte. Reading from an odd address (0x41) give the MSB and pops the
data off the FIFO. So, yes, the _rep variant can't be used in 8-bit
mode. It should still be fine in 16-bit.

page 45: http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/data_sheets/ds080.pdf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/