linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/30] USB: omap-ehci: Move PHY management to PHY driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5113C833.90706@ti.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:28:51 +0200
From:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	<sameo@...ux.intel.com>, <balbi@...com>,
	<stern@...land.harvard.edu>, <eballetbo@...il.com>,
	<javier@...hile0.org>, <sshtylyov@...sta.com>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/30] USB: omap-ehci: Move PHY management to PHY driver

On 02/06/2013 07:11 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> [130206 01:53]:
>> On 02/05/2013 07:17 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> [130205 09:00]:
>>>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 01:28:51PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>>> Hi Tony & Greg,
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the best way to get these patches in?
>>>>>
>>>>> All patches have been acked by respective maintainers.
>>>>>
>>>>> If Tony can Ack the arch/arm/mach-omap2 stuff then should I send a
>>>>> pull request directly to Greg? or the other way round?
>>>>>
>>>>> Tony, 
>>>>> fyi, these patches should not interfere with the dw3c/musb stuff
>>>>> sent by Felipe & Kishon.
>>>>
>>>> I'm fine with Tony just taking them all if he wants to.
>>>
>>> OK. Roger, can you please do me a pull request with these
>>> against v3.8-rc6?
>>>
>>
>> Tony,
>>
>> Since this depends on [1] and [2] which are both in linux-next, should
>> I base it on linux-next?
> 
> Maybe you can base it on some commit in Greg's USB tree?
> Just check with Greg that whatever you use as a base is an
> immutable commit and OK to use as a base.
>  
>> Another option is to defer this to 3.10 merge window, along with the
>> DT adaptation for OMAP USB Host.
> 
> Once you have a branch ready that builds and boots, let's see how
> badly that conflicts with other branches we have queued up. If it's
> trivial only, then maybe Greg can pick up the patches. If not, we
> can still try to merge it in later on during the merge window as
> it would be nice to get USB to usable point with DT.
> 

Great! The DT patches are still under review.

I've based the $subject patches on Greg's usb-next branch.

Since dependent patches [1] went into linux-next through Samuel's MFD tree
and are not in Greg's usb-next, I've added them as well in my branch.
Not sure how this goes :P.

The $subject patches are since commit a0c750bb8b023ab92e27c670a1c9378d52dd2053:

  mfd: omap-usb-host: get rid of build warning (2013-02-07 16:37:41 +0200)

are available in the git repository at:
  git://github.com/rogerq/linux.git usb-next-usbhost16


The patches [1] are since commit 9662ced3527f5994e83957cf40765ed126abe97f:

  usb: gadget: imx_udc: make it depend on BROKEN (2013-02-06 11:43:39 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:
  git://github.com/rogerq/linux.git usb-next-usbhost16-part

cheers,
-roger

[1] [PATCH v9 00/20] OMAP USB Host cleanup
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/23/155

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/