linux-kernel - Re[4]: [PATCH] mfd: syscon: Added support for using platform driver resources

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1360252328.221651004@f364.mail.ru>
Date:	Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:52:09 +0400
From:	Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>
To:	Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>
Cc:	Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re[4]: [PATCH] mfd: syscon: Added support for using platform driver resources

Hello.

> > ...
> >> Thanks for the patch adding non-dt support. :-)
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 07:00:40PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> >> > This patch adds support usage platform driver resources, i.e.
> >> > possibility works without oftree support. Additionally patch
> >> > removes CONFIG_OF dependency and adds helper for accessing
> >> > regmap by searching device by its name.
> > ...
> >> > +static int syscon_match_name(struct device *dev, void *data)
> >> > +{
> >> > +   return !strcmp(dev_name(dev), (const char *)data);
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +struct regmap *syscon_regmap_lookup_by_name(const char *name)
> >> > +{
> >> > +   struct syscon *syscon;
> >> > +   struct device *dev;
> >> > +
> >> > +   dev = driver_find_device(&syscon_driver.driver, NULL, (void *)name,
> >> > +                            syscon_match_name);
> >> > +   if (!dev)
> >> > +           return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> >> > +
> >> > +   syscon = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >> > +
> >> > +   return syscon->regmap;
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >>
> >> How about syscon_dev_to_regmap(struct device *dev) as the exist dt version
> >> syscon_node_to_regmap since it's not affected by the name change of devices?
> >
> > I am not completely understand what you mean. In my version which doing
> > search regmap by name, we can call this function with desired device name,
> > then use regmap:
> > struct regmap *r = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_name("syscon.1");
> >
> 
> My concern is that this API may be used by other client drivers, if we hardcode
> the device name in those drivers, once the device name is changed,
> all those drivers need change too.
> For dt case, we use device node to find regmap, so does not care about the name.
> 
> > You suggest use "struct device" as parameter?
> 
> A device pointer.
> 
> > I do not know what we should
> > use as parameter to the function in this case, since we can get "struct device"
> > only when register this device,
> 
> If we have a platform_device, then we have its device pointer, right?
> 
> > i.e. in board support code, not from anywhere,
> > for example from another driver.
> > Fixme please.
> >
> 
> My understanding is that in board support code, we can have the
> platform device instance
> of that syscon compatible device, then we can use it as the platform
> data parameter for those devices driver who wants to use it.
> Then in client driver, it can call:
> syscon_dev_to_regmap(syscon_compatible_dev)
> to find the regmap.
> Just like dt working way, the device node usually uses a phandle pointing to
> the syscon compatible node which it wants to use.

This is not as easy as it seems.
All devices that will use "syscon" driver, in this case should have a platform_data
record. I think that it can create problems with using these drivers as modules.
Alternatively, we can create additional (virtual) "compatible" text property in syscon
private data structure and use it to find the proper device. What is your opinion?

> > ...
> >> > +   if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && np) {
> >> > +           syscon->base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> >> > +           if (!syscon->base)
> >> > +                   return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> >> > +
> >> > +           res = &res_of;
> >> > +           ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, res);
> >> > +           if (ret)
> >> > +                   return ret;
> >> > +   } else {
> >> > +           res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >> > +           if (!res)
> >> > +                   return -ENXIO;
> >> > +
> >> > +           if (!request_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res),
> >> > +                                   dev_name(&pdev->dev)))
> >> > +                   return -EBUSY;
> >> > +
> >> > +           syscon->base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
> >> > +           if (!syscon->base)
> >> > +                   return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> >>
> >> devm_request_and_ioremap?
> >
> > We call of_iomap for DT-version,  for removal procedure - iounmap.
> > Will iounmap work properly with devm_-version, I'm not sure.
> 
> You're right, i'm afraid not.
> If that, i wonder the ioremap resource may be freed twice for driver removal.
> So, i'm okay with your current way.
> But one issue is that then we need take care of the resource free by ourselves
> for probe failed cases. e.g. ioremap and request_mem_region.
> You may need add them.

Yes, thanks. I forget about it.

> > May be better to completely remove ".remove" (and module_exit) feature for driver?
> > It is loaded at startup always once compiled, and should always be in the system.
> It supports to be a module, so it may be better to keep ".remove".

As far I can see, no. Kernel symbol defined as bool, so driver cannot be compiled
as module:
config MFD_SYSCON
        bool "System Controller Register R/W Based on Regmap"

Thanks!

---