linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/14] pinctrl/abx500: use direct IRQ defines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYCqU0srgiboJnOTaOiG+9BCk-Kbe0-jscMMcnyKnVUDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:10:38 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Anmar Oueja <anmar.oueja@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] pinctrl/abx500: use direct IRQ defines

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:

> I don't see myself on cc. Was that intentional?

No, it was my mistake...

> I quite like the idea of this.

Can I take it as an ACK? :-)

> Stephen,
>
> It doesn't mean the other patch was wrong, it just transfers the math.
>
> I wouldn't squash it into mine. I like the transition and the possibility to
> revert it if there's been some mistake.
>
> (not to say there is one, but just in case.)

I don't think it's wrong, just different. I changed
it after trying to subtract the offset in my head back
and forth a few times and screwed up the maths.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/