linux-kernel - net: rcu warnings in ip6fl_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51140154.9040901@oracle.com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Feb 2013 14:32:36 -0500
From:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
CC:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: net: rcu warnings in ip6fl_get_first

Hi guys,

I got the following while fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest:

[   51.680236] ===============================
[   51.681914] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
[   51.683610] 3.8.0-rc6-next-20130206-sasha-00028-g83214f7-dirty #276 Tainted: G        W
[   51.686703] -------------------------------
[   51.688281] net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c:671 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
[   51.691345]
[   51.691345] other info that might help us debug this:
[   51.691345]
[   51.694479]
[   51.694479] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
[   51.697650] 2 locks held by trinity/7421:
[   51.701271]  #0:  (&p->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff812b049a>] seq_read+0x3a/0x3d0
[   51.704292]  #1:  (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [<ffffffff8397cde0>] ip6fl_seq_start+0x0/0xe0
[   51.707845]
[   51.707845] stack backtrace:
[   51.709678] Pid: 7421, comm: trinity Tainted: G        W    3.8.0-rc6-next-20130206-sasha-00028-g83214f7-dirty #276
[   51.713495] Call Trace:
[   51.714370]  [<ffffffff81181fdb>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x10b/0x120
[   51.716560]  [<ffffffff8397caca>] ip6fl_get_first+0x8a/0x140
[   51.718755]  [<ffffffff8397cdb7>] ip6fl_seq_next+0x17/0x40
[   51.720963]  [<ffffffff812b0711>] seq_read+0x2b1/0x3d0
[   51.723056]  [<ffffffff812b0460>] ? seq_lseek+0x110/0x110
[   51.725238]  [<ffffffff812f9c0c>] proc_reg_read+0x9c/0xd0
[   51.727266]  [<ffffffff812f9b70>] ? proc_reg_write+0xd0/0xd0
[   51.729337]  [<ffffffff8128b2eb>] do_loop_readv_writev+0x4b/0x90
[   51.731846]  [<ffffffff8128b566>] do_readv_writev+0xf6/0x1d0
[   51.734092]  [<ffffffff8128b6de>] vfs_readv+0x3e/0x60
[   51.736015]  [<ffffffff8128b750>] sys_readv+0x50/0xd0
[   51.737930]  [<ffffffff83d73d98>] tracesys+0xe1/0xe6

This is the result of commit "ipv6 flowlabel: Convert hash list to RCU." which
mixes between regular and _bh() locking.


Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/