linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 70/77] ipc: convert to idr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130207194314.GR2875@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:43:14 -0800
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 70/77] ipc: convert to idr_alloc()

Convert to the much saner new idr interface.

The new interface doesn't directly translate to the way idr_pre_get()
was used around ipc_addid() as preloading disables preemption.  From
my cursory reading, it seems like we should be able to do all
allocation from ipc_addid(), so I moved it there.  Can you please
check whether this would be okay?  If this is wrong and ipc_addid()
should be allowed to be called from non-sleepable context, I'd suggest
allocating id itself in the outer functions and later install the
pointer using idr_replace().

Only compile tested.

v2: The v1 conversion of ipcget_public() was incorrect.  As
    idr_pre_get() returns 0 for -ENOMEM failure, @err should have been
    initialized to 1 not 0.  As the function doesn't do preloading
    itself anymore, there's no point in the error handling path.
    Simply remove the -ENOMEM path.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
---
 ipc/util.c |   30 +++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

--- a/ipc/util.c
+++ b/ipc/util.c
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ int ipc_addid(struct ipc_ids* ids, struc
 {
 	kuid_t euid;
 	kgid_t egid;
-	int id, err;
+	int id;
 	int next_id = ids->next_id;
 
 	if (size > IPCMNI)
@@ -261,17 +261,21 @@ int ipc_addid(struct ipc_ids* ids, struc
 	if (ids->in_use >= size)
 		return -ENOSPC;
 
+	idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
+
 	spin_lock_init(&new->lock);
 	new->deleted = 0;
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	spin_lock(&new->lock);
 
-	err = idr_get_new_above(&ids->ipcs_idr, new,
-				(next_id < 0) ? 0 : ipcid_to_idx(next_id), &id);
-	if (err) {
+	id = idr_alloc(&ids->ipcs_idr, new,
+		       (next_id < 0) ? 0 : ipcid_to_idx(next_id), 0,
+		       GFP_NOWAIT);
+	idr_preload_end();
+	if (id < 0) {
 		spin_unlock(&new->lock);
 		rcu_read_unlock();
-		return err;
+		return id;
 	}
 
 	ids->in_use++;
@@ -307,19 +311,10 @@ static int ipcget_new(struct ipc_namespa
 		struct ipc_ops *ops, struct ipc_params *params)
 {
 	int err;
-retry:
-	err = idr_pre_get(&ids->ipcs_idr, GFP_KERNEL);
-
-	if (!err)
-		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	down_write(&ids->rw_mutex);
 	err = ops->getnew(ns, params);
 	up_write(&ids->rw_mutex);
-
-	if (err == -EAGAIN)
-		goto retry;
-
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -376,8 +371,6 @@ static int ipcget_public(struct ipc_name
 	struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp;
 	int flg = params->flg;
 	int err;
-retry:
-	err = idr_pre_get(&ids->ipcs_idr, GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	/*
 	 * Take the lock as a writer since we are potentially going to add
@@ -389,8 +382,6 @@ retry:
 		/* key not used */
 		if (!(flg & IPC_CREAT))
 			err = -ENOENT;
-		else if (!err)
-			err = -ENOMEM;
 		else
 			err = ops->getnew(ns, params);
 	} else {
@@ -413,9 +404,6 @@ retry:
 	}
 	up_write(&ids->rw_mutex);
 
-	if (err == -EAGAIN)
-		goto retry;
-
 	return err;
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/