linux-kernel - Re: kvmtool tree (Was: Re: [patch] config: fix make kvmconfig)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130208084442.d94a82546672286f421b0ee0@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:44:42 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kvmtool tree (Was: Re: [patch] config: fix make kvmconfig)

Hi,

On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:55:08 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
> So why don't we let Linus either accept and reject it for the 3.9 merge,
> but it rejected, we drop it from linux-next until such time as Linus'
> objections have been addressed?

It has been in linux-next since before v3.2.  It has been submitted
multiple times.  Last October, after not accepting it for the v3.7 merge
window, Linus said:

"I have yet to see a compelling argument for merging it. It's tons of
code, it doesnt match the original "small simple" model, and I think
it would be better off as a separate project."

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped