[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51143A87.4040205@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:36:39 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: arm@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve CLKSRC_OF matching
On 02/07/2013 04:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 07 February 2013, Rob Herring wrote:
>> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>
>> In the recently added support for OF based clocksource init, a device node
>> will be matched twice. We can fix this by passing the device node to the
>> init functions and removing the match functions within the init functions.
>>
>> This is based on arm-soc for-next branch and commit "of: fix incorrect
>> return value of of_find_matching_node_and_match()" in my DT for-next
>> branch.
>>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Conceptually this is definitely the way to go, but I noticed that
> you create build warnings for the bisection points after the
> first patch. I would suggest actually merging the first three
> patches into one and also changing the prototype for the tegra
> function in that patch to avoid this.
>
How so? I don't see a warning as there is no type checking on the init
function since of_device_id.data is just a void *. It would be good to
have type checking here if you know a way, but I don't. I agree it is a
bit abusive and can change it as you suggest.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists