[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fw18svky.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:31:57 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
ak@...ux.intel.com, acme@...hat.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung.kim@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf stat: add per processor socket count aggregation
Hi Stephane,
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:46:00 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> This patch adds per-processor socket count aggregation
> for system-wide mode measurements. This is a useful
> mode to detect imbalance between sockets for uniform
> workloads.
>
> To enable this mode, use --aggr-socket in addition
> to -a. (system-wide). This mode can be combined with
> interval printing.
>
> The output includes the socket number and the number
> of online processors on that socket. This is useful
> to gauge the amount of aggregation.
>
> # ./perf stat -I 1000 -a --aggr-socket -e cycles sleep 2
> # time socket cpus counts events
> 1.000097680 S0 4 5,788,785 cycles
> 2.000379943 S0 4 27,361,546 cycles
> 2.001167808 S0 4 818,275 cycles
Can it be genericized to support arbitrary cpu topology like per-core,
per-numa-node or something?
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists