[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kf1kul$699$2@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 01:38:29 +0000 (UTC)
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net: rcu warnings in ip6fl_get_first
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 at 19:32 GMT, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I got the following while fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest:
>
> [ 51.680236] ===============================
> [ 51.681914] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
> [ 51.683610] 3.8.0-rc6-next-20130206-sasha-00028-g83214f7-dirty #276 Tainted: G W
> [ 51.686703] -------------------------------
> [ 51.688281] net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c:671 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
> [ 51.691345]
It should use rcu_dereference_bh()...
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
index ea42bf4..c50080f 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
@@ -65,13 +65,13 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ip6_fl_lock);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ip6_sk_fl_lock);
#define for_each_fl_rcu(hash, fl) \
- for (fl = rcu_dereference(fl_ht[(hash)]); \
+ for (fl = rcu_dereference_bh(fl_ht[(hash)]); \
fl != NULL; \
- fl = rcu_dereference(fl->next))
+ fl = rcu_dereference_hb(fl->next))
#define for_each_fl_continue_rcu(fl) \
- for (fl = rcu_dereference(fl->next); \
+ for (fl = rcu_dereference_bh(fl->next); \
fl != NULL; \
- fl = rcu_dereference(fl->next))
+ fl = rcu_dereference_bh(fl->next))
#define for_each_sk_fl_rcu(np, sfl) \
for (sfl = rcu_dereference_bh(np->ipv6_fl_list); \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists